Learning Center

We keep you up to date on the latest tax changes and news in the industry.

Understanding Michigan's New Marijuana Tax Case

Once again, Michigan emerges as a focal point in the national cannabis policy arena, spotlighting a contentious 24% wholesale marijuana tax now under constitutional scrutiny. As the first court hearing propels the issue into the national spotlight, its ripples could impact cannabis pricing and influence how states uphold voter-endorsed laws and tax reforms.

Beyond Michigan's borders, this case's outcome could shape how states craft, adapt, and uphold cannabis taxation, potentially signalling upcoming legal contests as the industry matures.

Let’s delve into the critical aspects Americans should be aware of.

Michigan's Proposed Taxation Strategy

Michigan's 2025–2026 fiscal plan includes a proposed 24% wholesale cannabis tax, intended to generate revenue for road improvements. This levy targets transactions earlier in the cannabis distribution chain—prior to reaching dispensary shelves.

Image 1

Currently, Michigan implements two existing taxes:

  • 10% excise tax on consumer cannabis purchases, ratified in 2018 by voters

  • 6% state sales tax adds another layer to costs. Should this new wholesale tax be ratified, Michigan's tax regime would rank among the most burdensome in the US for cannabis.

Legal Concerns by the Cannabis Sector

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) is challenging the tax's constitutionality. Their argument hinges on a pivotal aspect:

The 2018 marijuana initiative, sanctioned by voters, cannot be amended without a supermajority vote in the legislature.

The Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), enacted by public vote, necessitates a three-fourths supermajority for any modifications. Conversely, the wholesale tax was approved with a simple majority.

MCIA spokesperson Rose Tantraphol has articulated the association's determination to uphold voter intentions as highlighted by Michigan Advance:

“As the leading cannabis trade association, our courtroom battle protects Michigan voters' interests.”

Image 2

Industry advocates caution that the tax might inflate costs, burden small enterprises, and potentially divert consumers to the unregulated market—a trend evident in high-tax environments like California.

The Government's Justification

Michigan's stance on the tax's legitimacy is rooted in three main points:

  • The wholesale tax is novel, not an amendment of the 2018 voter law

  • Legislative authority encompasses tax creation for budgetary necessities

  • The tax's intent is road infrastructure funding, distinct from cannabis policy alterations

Should the judiciary validate this reasoning, the tax is slated for implementation on January 1, 2026.

Implications for Consumers

Even non-Michiganders should be attentive, as cannabis tax blueprints often inspire inter-state emulations. If upheld, this tax may:

  • Augment wholesale and retail prices

  • Encourage a shift back to illicit market options for cost-saving

  • Exert pressure on minor players, leading to market concentration

Conversely, if annulled, Michigan’s existing—comparatively moderate—tax framework would persist.

Broader National Repercussions

Although this litigation is Michigan-centric, its ramifications span beyond:

1. Voter-Approved Law Dynamics

This case examines the vulnerability of ballot-initiated laws against legislative adjustments sans majority consensus.

2. Taxing Models Across States

If Michigan’s model prevails, states grappling with infrastructure deficits might mimic it.

3. Cannabis Tax Disparities

States like Oregon and Michigan maintain lower taxes for competitive pricing, while others face parallel illicit market challenges due to higher tax rates.

This Michigan legal contest could set a precedent for tax-related disputes in other jurisdictions.

What Lies Ahead?

Having conducted initial hearings, a Michigan Court of Claims judge will soon deliver a ruling. The matter might escalate to Michigan's Supreme Court.

Regardless of the verdict, the decision will majorly impact Michigan's cannabis trade and potentially reshape national approaches to voter initiatives, nascent business sectors, and taxation authority.

Share this article...

Want tax & accounting tips and insights?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .

Get Started Today

Book a free discovery call and let us show you how our expertise can save you money in the long run.

Let's Get Started